Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix javadoc warnings #145

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2024
Merged

docs: fix javadoc warnings #145

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2024

Conversation

javier-godoy
Copy link
Member

@javier-godoy javier-godoy commented Nov 6, 2024

Close #141

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced API documentation for event listener methods in the Google Map Marker component.
    • Clearer return value descriptions for adding drag end and click event listeners, improving usability.

@javier-godoy javier-godoy requested a review from paodb November 6, 2024 14:23
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GoogleMapMarker class within the src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps package. It updates the Javadoc documentation for the addDragEndEventListener and addClickListener methods to clarify that they return a handle for removing the listener. The changes focus solely on enhancing documentation without altering any method signatures or the underlying functionality of the class.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/googlemaps/GoogleMapMarker.java Updated Javadoc for addDragEndEventListener and addClickListener to clarify return values.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Fix Javadoc warnings (#141)

Possibly related PRs

  • docs: update javadocs #143: The changes in this PR involve updates to Javadoc documentation in the GoogleMap class, which is part of the same package as the GoogleMapMarker class, indicating a focus on improving API clarity similar to the documentation updates in the main PR.
  • Fix javadoc #144: This PR also focuses on Javadoc improvements and code formatting in the GoogleMap class, which shares a common context with the GoogleMapMarker class, reinforcing the theme of enhancing documentation clarity.

Suggested reviewers

  • paodb

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 6, 2024

@paodb paodb merged commit f3cb1df into master Nov 6, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@paodb paodb deleted the fix-javadoc branch November 6, 2024 14:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix Javadoc warnings
2 participants